Chapter 19 · Chapter exam
Chapter 19 exam
A 8-question review of all 4 lessons in Chapter 19. Answer every question, then check your answers: each one comes with an explanation, and you can retake the exam as often as you like.
Chapter 19 exam Chapter 19 review
8 questions · self-graded
1 What is the Leluka form of λαμβάνω ? λέλαβα ἔλαβον εἴληφα ἐλάμβανον
λαμβάνω has a unique Leluka stem, εἴληφα ; ἔλαβον is Efagon and ἐλάμβανον is Eluon.
2 Which of these Luo → Leluka pairs correctly illustrate the reduplication rules? Select all that apply χωρέω → κεχώρηκα (fricative χ becomes κ) φυτεύω → φεφύτευκα (fricative φ kept)γινώσκω → ἔγνωκα (ε added instead of reduplication)δίδωμι → δίδωκα (ι reduplication kept)ἐγγίζω → ἤγγικα (vowel lengthens)ἀκούω → ἀκήκοα (vowel reduplicates and lengthens)
Reduplicated fricatives become stops (so φυτεύω gives πεφύτευκα) , and the ι reduplication of -μι verbs is replaced by ε (δέδωκα) .
3 Which form of the Luo active participle of πίνω is feminine accusative plural? πινούσαις πίνουσαι πινουσῶν πινούσας
Following the τράπεζα pattern, the fem acc pl is πινούσας ; πινούσαις is dat pl and πίνουσαι is nom pl.
4 The feminine Luo active participle uses 3rd declension endings, just like the masculine. True or false True False
The feminine Luo participle has 1st declension endings, following the τράπεζα pattern.
5 In Ἐσθίοντος τοῦ προφήτου , ὁ διδάσκαλος ἐπορεύθη πρὸς αὐτόν , what relationship holds between the two clauses? Causal: the eating caused the teacher to go Temporal: the two events happen at the same time Conditional: the teacher went if the prophet ate Location: the teacher went where the prophet ate
The only connection is that the events happen at the same time; the Luo participle suggests the eating was still going on when the teacher went.
6 Which of these examples show the plural quantifier πᾶς used with a pronoun? Select all that apply πάντες γὰρ οἱ προφῆται … ἐπροφήτευσαν πάντες δὲ ὑμεῖς ἀδελφοί ἐστε πάντες ἥμαρτον ἀπέθανον οὗτοι πάντες
πᾶς may precede a personal pronoun (πάντες ὑμεῖς) or follow a demonstrative (οὗτοι πάντες) . The others show it with an article + noun and on its own.
7 In ἦλθον εἰς Θεσσαλονίκην ὅπου ἦν συναγωγὴ τῶν Ἰουδαίων (Acts 17:1), what does the ὅπου clause modify? A hypothetical world The noun συναγωγή The explicit location Θεσσαλονίκην An implicit location of the verb ἦν
The relative clause further describes the named place, Thessalonica, as a location where there was a synagogue.
8 According to this lesson, why is the Leluka form not inherently ‘exegetically significant’? It is too rare in the NT to matter It encodes a temporal relationship like other verb forms; its significance depends on the event and the discourse It has no temporal meaning at all It always means the same thing as the Aorist
All sides agree the perfect encodes a temporal relationship; like any verb form, its significance depends on the eventuality and its place in the discourse.
Become a fluent reader of the biblical languages Biblingo is the only language-learning app (mobile and web) that provides everything you need to go from zero knowledge of Greek, Hebrew, and Latin to reading the Bible in its original and historic languages — all in one place.
Start Free Trial